Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Lens Test update

Subject: Re: [OM] Lens Test update
From: frieder.faig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 00:35:30 +0200
On Sat, Jun 24, 2000 at 07:30:44PM +0200, Richard Schaetzl wrote:
> Gary Reese wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for your observations and comments on curvature of field in the
> > 35mm Shift lens. It is very good to know that it clears up at infinity.
> 
> > Well, I'm using a 60" wide map reproduced at 1:40 magnification...  
> 
> I real appreciate your work of testing Olympus lenses. Your testing
> conditions are transparent and your different setups showed
> interesting dependencies of different camera-lens combinations and
> lens variants. Thanks to you, Olympus user are more able to choose the
> right lens and setting for the job.
> Your effort and that of many others on the list helped to improve the
> situation of underrepresentation of Olympus OM stuff on the web and in
> the public.
> More important, your test helped to improve the Zuikoholic self-esteem
> against the "big bad N*k*n, C*n*n syndicate" ;-)
> 
> Lenses designs are an compromise, optimized for different purposes
> (and wallets).

Yes, it is good to know the performance-curve over the apertures.
But I´m still dreaming of a performance pass for a lens, which indicate
for what purpse it was designed, and where`s the compromise.

Here is my guess about the 50mm Zuiko´s:
1.8/50 and 1.4/50 are often used as first lens for general  Photography,
and are desiged for even performance on a high level with respect to 
most used middle apperture range. 
1.2/50 and 1.2/55 are the low level specialists. So they are designed
for best possible wide open performance, with respect to cope high contrast.

I remember a night shooting session, of buildings with chrismas illumination.
I decided to use the 1.8/50 instead of the 1.4/50, because I used a tripod and
won`t need the speed.  I`ve just had  acquired a new 1.8 MC-lens and thought it
is "superrior" according to some tests.
Then some slide´s showed ugly ghost images of the lights
due to internal reflections -the high contrast problem when you have overexposed
 lights at night shooting!
I`ve never noticed any ghost reflections in comparable night shoot`s with my 
1.4/50mm.
Maybe this is a matter the 1.4`s design pays more attention to than the 
1.8-version
- Who knows? 

Frieder Faig


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz