Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] copyright issues

Subject: Re: [OM] copyright issues
From: "Gregg" <giverson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 21:36:33 -0400
Many of you work for companies that own the rights to anything you develop
while working for them.  I remember all the note pads at AT&T when I visited
there a few years ago.  Each individual had to log any ideas they have about
a project they are working on or probably other ideas too.  They learned
well from Edison.  He wasn't always first to develop something, but he sure
knew to get the rights to it before others thought of it.

Gregg

>From Dirk Wright


 >Mike wrote:

> >Please keep us advised as to what you find out. In the racing
> >photography world this is a very serious (and hotly debated) issue. In
> >fact, this year NASCAR tried to do what the NFL does which is not
> allow
> >media credentialed photographers to keep their own work among other
> >things that alientated the media until they (NASCAR) backed down.
> Print
> >sales by racing photographers is also something that is part of this
> >debate. What I and others maintain is that so long as our print sales
> >are "limited art" prints that we are okay as we are entitles as
> >"artists" to sell our "art." One major racing sanctioning body I am
> >aware of has threated some photographers that if they sell prints
> >obtained with a media credential that they would "blackball" their
> >ability to receive credentials in the future. It's not like many of us
> >who shoot motorsports are getting rich off of it, a few do well, but
> >like most types of photogography, most (like me) struggle.
> >
>
> OK, I'm NOT an attorney, so my advice could be all wrong. But, both
> NASCAR and NFL are private corporations, and the venues for the events
> are private also. So, they can basically make up whatever rules they
> want about photography, etc. Exemptions are usually provided for the
> news media because they want free exposure through news channels.
> Photographers there to make money off of prints is another story. Note,
> this has NOTHING to do with copyrights. It's their property, it's their
> program, they can make up the rules to suit them. If you are there to
> make money selling prints, I would be very careful to not offend
> anyone, particularly the team managers and owners. If it were me, I
> would build good relationships with the team owners and managers, since
> the heads of the organizations (NASCAR, etc.) listen to them more than
> anyone else. At least that's the way it appears to me.
>
> The issue of photographer's no longer owning their negatives is an
> ongoing problem. Many news organizations (AP, etc), only sign contracts
> with photographers that are willing to give up their copyrights to the
> pictures. There's a name for these kinds of contracts which escapes me
> right now.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Be seeing you.
>
>
> Dirk Wright
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz