Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] RE: More TOYS--OM4T

Subject: RE: [OM] RE: More TOYS--OM4T
From: Chip Stratton <cstrat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2000 21:17:16 -0500

> I called Columbus Camera Saturday and was told flat out to stay
> away, that it
> was probably beyond repair, among other things, it had been
> mistreated and was
> ugly and was being sold strictly "as is". In short, the person I
> spoke with
> tried to dissuade me from buying it, which is unusual for a salesperson.
> Moreover, Brian states that it failed the 4T battery test, which
> to me means
> that it does not have the 4T circuitry in it or it's inoperable.
> Which seems to
> imply that it is not a true 4T. The person with whom I spoke was aware of
> Brian's post and asked me what it said. In short, I called
> intending to buy it,
> but was told in great detail that it would be a mistake. The fact
> that a store
> in business to sell cameras warned me away from this OM4T speaks
> volumes, to me.

I suspect they have realized they underpriced it and have no interest now in
selling it to anyone for only $150.00!

Chip Stratton
cstrat@xxxxxxxxx


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz