Not meaning to start a thread discussing the legality of either, but does
anyone notice an inconsistancy in the judicial system when one can abort,
but not photograph in the buff, an fetus/infant?
Gregg
Garry Lewis pointed out:>
>
> Take under advisement
>
>
http://www.apbnews.com/newscenter/breakingnews/2000/03/07/kidporn0307_01.htm
l
>
> The old world of "artistic expression" longer exists when it comes to
child nudity. Be careful,
> an innocent serendipitous photo could land you a legal stigmata of child
abuser and panderer.
>
> yours understanding the fear of lost childhood, but fearing the scared mob
mentality,
>
> Garry D. Lewis
> --
> a day without an Olympus camera is like a day without "Sunny 16"
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|