On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Barry B. Bean wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2000 16:51:58 -0500, Tom Scales wrote:
>
> >85-250 - First, it's big. Really big.
>
> Only in the context of the zuiko system. Compared to 3rd party and
> non-Oly offerings in this range it's positively tiny. My Tokina
> 300/2.8 dwarfs theis zoom.
I'd expect a 300/2.8 to dwarf most lenses (how big is it in comparison
to a zuiko 350/2.8?). IMO a more sane comparison would be with
something like a Sigma 75-300 (because I have one). IIRC it's about the
same size, if not actually smaller than a 85-250.
--
________________________________________________________________________
* | |
| / | |/-\ | Ian A. Nichols |
| | | | | | |
| \-/| | / | i.a.nichols@xxxxxxxxxx |
| * iann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|