Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] website update

Subject: Re: [OM] website update
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 15:58:00 -0500
Cc: <wright@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
I mostly scan Fuji print film and it seems to scan pretty well.  I suspect
that film types are a bit scanner specific, as one scanner might do better
than the other. I use the Polaroid Sprintscan 4000.

That said, I like your pictures.  I don't see any negatives at all. It's a
beautiful series.

Tom

> Hello, I updated my web site about my neighborhood and added a gallery
page.
> Hope you enjoy it!
>
> http://www.kreative.net/wright/hickoryclusterweb/hc2intro.html
>
> I'm not really satisfied with the images in digital form. Anyone have
advice
> on which film scans the best? I think I should use a low contrast film,
since
> these images have way too much contrast in them. I used Kodak's 100VS
> etkachrome.
> --
> Be Seeing You.
> Dirk Wright
> In Pocatello, Idaho, a law passed in 1912 provided that "The carrying
> of concealed weapons is forbidden, unless same are exhibited to public
> view."
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz