Just goes to show how much subjectivity is involved in our "personal
ratings" (i.e., opinions) of lenses.
Lex
===
From: Ilona Lemieux <lmx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [OM] 35-70 2.8, 350 2.8 tests
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 05:14:37 -0400
The september issue of the german "color foto" lists lens test results
going back 10 years, or so.
Seems the much lusted after 35-80 2.8 didn't hold up too well compared with
3 Leicas and a Zeiss, in spite of costing more than all but one...In fact,
of the 5 manual focus standard zooms tested, it did worst. What
gives?...Interesting is that those seldom lusted after AF Zuik zooms have
pretty
decent tests scores.
You can order from color foto the test magazine issues per email:
bestellservice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
frank, berlin
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|