At 10:38 AM 9/6/2000 EDT, you wrote:
>Let me weigh in on the side of the new Supra. I've shot and scanned both
the
>100 and 400 asa Supra. I love the saturation and contrast of both speeds.
>The 400 lets me use my 35-70 f/4 and my 75-150 f/4 at their most desirable
>apertures and at high shutter speeds.
>
>I have scanned both and find them to be super sharp. Additionally, the skin
>tones rival Portra and the Supra doesn't require special processing channels
>or special handling like Portra. I get it for a lower price at the local
pro
>shop than one pays for Gold, so for a negative film, I think it's the film
of
>choice for me.
>Dave Dougherty
Dave,
I've shot some Supra 100 and I'll probably go back for more. I'm curious
about the 400. Any reason to prefer it to Royal Gold 400 (which seems to
me to be extremely good)?
Joel Wilcox
Iowa City, Iowa USA
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|