Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 10:03:06 -0700
From: Gary Reese <pcacala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [OM] Zuiko 24/f2.8 compared to the Zuiko 28/f2.8
Gary writes:
That is an extremely useful lens for landscapes, but you would probably
discover yourself taking a 35-70mm zoom rather than a 35mm prime if you
owned both. It becomes a matter of weight and available space.
______________________________________________
I was just thinking something along the same lines. For me, space is
the
primary consideration because I just don't want to lug around a lot of
dead
weight (thats why I got rid of my Nikon stuff!). In that regard, has
anyone
tried the Vivitar 17-35? I'm wondering if this would be an acceptable
solution?
I'm shooting for 3 lenses: a wide angle something, a 50, and the 75-150.
Thanks
Hal
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|