Re: [OM] Tamron 80-200 f2.8 thanks! (+ Q on 180/2.5)

[Gary Reese]

Hi Mike:

<< With the [Tamron SP] 80-200/2.8 I don't really see a need to carry a
prime in that range any longer. >>

Yup, I agree with you. Only if one HAS to reduce bulk or weight does an
alternative need to be considered.  It is THAT GOOD.

Gary Reese
Las Vegas, NV

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >