Ah ah ah!!! to late you made our choice, live with it pal. Maybe you will think
more carefully next time. (Like when selecting a camera body in a similar
thread!) And to make sure that you don't change your mind yet a gain, send all
of your other lenses to list members for safekeeping! :)
John Hermanson wrote:
> I must amend my hasty choice to the 35-105.
>
> John Hermanson
> ___________________________________
> Camtech, Olympus Service since 1977.
> 21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743-4714
> 631-424-2121 http://www.zuiko.com
> Free Olympus Manuals: 1-800-221-3000
> ___________________________________
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Joel Wilcox <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 11:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [OM] If you could use only ONE lens . . .
>
> | If I get to have my tripod, it would be the 35-105/3.5-4.5; if handheld
> | only, 35-70/3.5-4.5. If I owned it, the 35-80/2.8 with tripod or not ...
> |
> | Joel Wilcox
> | Iowa City, Iowa USA
> | ----- Original Message -----
> | From: "Ray Moth" <ray_moth@xxxxxxxxx>
> | To: "Olympus Mailing List" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 1:20 AM
> | Subject: [OM] If you could use only ONE lens . . .
> |
> |
> | > Dear All,
> | >
> | > I'd like to ask a (dumb?) question of the List . . . if you had to
> | > choose only ONE Zuiko lens to use on your OM body, to cover all your
> | > 'conventional' photographic needs (excluding macro, document copying,
> | > astro, medical and other scientific), what would it be?
> | >
> | > Regards,
> | >
> | >
> | > =====
> | > Ray
> |
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|