GEEZ! Thanks for all of you 'help' John! Now my list has expanded to THREE
exepnsive peices of glass! :)
John Palmer wrote:
> Jim Couch says
>
> > The other item that falls in a similar category is the 1.4xA
> > teleconvertor. On occasion I would love to have one to pair
> > with my 300mm, but I don't see enough need for it to justify
> > the cost.
>
> Buy yourself a 250/2. Then:
>
> 1) With the 1.4x A converter you've got a 350/2.8 as well. They really
> do work together well, and you must have seen the good things Mike
> Veglia says about the 350/2.8.
>
> 2) By comparison with the cost of the lens, the converter cost is a
> very small number of peanuts, so you won't even notice it!
>
> John
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|