Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM][OT] Hideous prints addendum to last post

Subject: Re: [OM][OT] Hideous prints addendum to last post
From: Garth Wood <garth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 08:28:39 -0600
X-rays?  Probably not.

Last year I passed through London Heathrow, which probably has some of the most 
antiquated X-ray clunkers in the Western industrialized world.  They flat-out 
refused to hand-inspect my film (although they were quite polite about it), and 
I handed over my babies with some trepidation.

When I got home and processed everything, it all looked great.  Mixed bag of 
Kodak and Fuji stuff, some neg, some tranny.  No problems as far as I could 
tell.

Oh yeah, each film canister had been scanned at least four times by various 
X-ray machines in both directions.  Several had been scanned six times.  All 
had been scanned at least twice by the Heathrow clunkers.

Garth

  
"A bad day doing photography is better
 than a good day doing just about 
 anything else."
 
The Unofficial Olympus Web Photo Gallery at:

   http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/, or
   http://www.enable.org/~gallery/


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz