Don't mean to continue the argument and I have no problem to the sales that
James posted. But I really don't think $550 is a fair price for a Zuiko 16mm
with that many problems described, especially with scratch on rear element
which could affect picture quality as the element is very small.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: [OM][FS] 16mm fisheye and 2 OM-2 bodies
> Then don't buy it. And, you're actually incorrect. The auction was
closed
> early when the buyer negotiated a price. That price would not be reflected
> on ebay. I know for a fact that this purchase was not made just to do a
> quick turnaround, as I was in conversations with the buyer during the
> process. As be posted here, his circumstances changed (i.e. his wife
caught
> him) so he decided to sell it.
>
> More power to him. If I wanted a 16, I'd snap it up. I think it is a
fair
> price.
>
> Tom
>
> From: "Larry" <halpert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> > The items were sold on eBay, and the black OM-2 + the fisheye only went
> for $255
> > together. The asking prices now are rediculous. $550 for a 16mm with a
> rear
> > element scratch is obviously out of range, and is why ON eBay, it didn't
> go for
> > more.
> >
> > Larry
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|