ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?

from Barry B. Bean

Subject:	Re: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?
From:	"Barry B. Bean" <bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:21:44 -0600 (CST)

I get my best results scanning color transparencies and black and
white negatives. Color negatives have so far proven beyond my
capacity.
-
B.B. Bean                                       bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bean & Bean Cotton Co/Bean Farms                http://www.beancotton.com
Peach Orchard, MO


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?, Tony Winkless Re: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?, Tom Scales RE: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?, Chip Stratton Re: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?, Bruce Appelbaum Re: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?, Barry B. Bean <= RE: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?, jowilcox RE: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?, Chip Stratton Re: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?, Tom Scales Re: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?, Tom Scales Re: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] QA310 Cap., John Hermanson RE: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?, jowilcox

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] 35EC, clintonr
Next by Date:	Re: Re: [OM] Manual for OM-1, coneill
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?, Bruce Appelbaum
Next by Thread:	RE: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?, jowilcox
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]