TAKO. INTERNET SEIT 1996.
Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] political retraction speech

Subject: Re: [OM] political retraction speech
From: "Samuel Morales" <dolphans1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 12:11:52 -0600
Brian,

I can respect that. I was just hoping to have a little dialogue with those
whom may have been interested in stating an opinion. Generally, if there is
a post I am not interested in or can't reply to, I usually delete  or do not
respond.  In general think I the election has turned out to be a debacle, at
least it seems that way and I found it to be interesting. Also the
Presidential election occurs every 4 years, maybe I'm the problem, perhaps
my thinking and logic is flawed. In any event, I hope I receive a full
narrator pardon for my error in judgement.

Respectfully,

Sam...


-----Original Message-----
From: Brian P. Huber <bphuber@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, November 10, 2000 12:24 AM
Subject: RE: [OM] political retraction speech


>Sam,
>I believe the negative reaction you received was a direct result of
>attempting to start a totally OT discussion without any Olympus basis.
>Most, repeat, most of the nasty off-topic discussions have begun rather
>innocently.
>There is nothing we can settle or define in this group, probably no other
>group either.
>
>It gains the "Olympus community" nothing to discuss this.
>
>I don't think you were wrong in using good judgment, I think you were using
>poor judgment in attempting to use this group for that particular forum.
>Censorship has little to do with it, that is not the topic of this group.
>Period.  We go through  too much when we get off topic without meaning too!
>Why ask for trouble?
>
>Brian P. Huber
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Samuel Morales
>> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:15 PM
>> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [OM] political retraction speech
>>
>>
>> I am amazed by the fact that someone cannot make a post on a
>> forum group
>> among friends. My post was not inserted as an attempt to irk or offend
>> anyone. I was naively curious to what some members may have
>> thought about
>> the closest election I have ever witnessed in my life time. I
>> thought it
>> would make a good conversation piece, unfortunately I was
>> dead wrong, for
>> others disagree.
>>
>> Maybe what my mom told me when I was a child was correct,
>> there are two
>> things you never talk about in pubic, 1) religion, 2) politics.
>>
>> I apologize to those that were offended by my post. I always
>> thought the
>> internet was a new forum to reasonably expand the freedom of
>> speech. I guess
>> I was grossly wrong in using good judgement and it appears
>> censorship is
>> alive and kicking irregardless of were it used.
>>
>> It's also true in the old cliche; " you can't please everyone"
>>
>> Back to the cameras I go... Hi Hoo, Hi Hummmm....
>>
>> Sam....
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>>
>>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>