Jim Couch wrote:
> Did you really mean to imply that Nabisco is at fault here? Your post
> seesm to read that way. This is just so typical! Just because the wafers get
> soggy you jump to the conclusion that Nabisco must be at fault! Nilla wafers
> have not changed in years. I do not undeerstand how a supposedly intellegent
> person such as yourself can ignore the wealth of evidence that cleary shows
> that changes to the formulation of banana pudding are what cause the problem.
> This has been well known for many years, yet some folks, such as yourself
> unjustly accuse Nabisco of causing this problem. I suggest the next time you
> choose to bring up this kind of OT subject, that you at least take a little
> time to do some research and carefully word your statement.
> Sincerely (NOT)
> Jim Couch <BIG GRIN>
Are you sure it isn't the bioengineered bananas from the CIA plantations
in Central America?
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >