Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] [OT] Why am i an idiot - what is wrong with this calculation

Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] Why am i an idiot - what is wrong with this calculation
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 19:39:03 -0600
Well, I'm not very good with math, but I get a higher resolution than that
with my Polaroid Sprintscan.  5500x3500 is about 18 megapixel.

Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: <atk@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 6:55 PM
Subject: [OM] [OT] Why am i an idiot - what is wrong with this calculation


>
> Ok -- I'm trying to figure out digital resolution for 'decent' 35mm. Lets
> assume each pixel is high fidelity. A good film/lens combo gives you 50
lpm
> (you might be able to get 100 -- but 50 is pretty good for every day
usage).
>
> You need two rows per 'lpm' so 100*35*24*100 = 8400000 or 8 meg pixel
(around
> 24 meg bytes). According to these calculations an 8meg pixel camera should
be
> on par with typical high (but not optimal) 35mm system. I thought the
number
> was much higher -- what is wrong with my calculations ?
>
> Alan
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz