Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Re: OM-2000

Subject: Re: [OM] Re: OM-2000
From: "gries" <gries@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 11:51:04 -0600
well, the way I've been doing it is to filter for one type of lighting, then 
double expose for whatever else may be in the room (i.e. tungsten lights w/ 
flourescents in the background....)

also, most of the OM-1 cameras that I've seen either need the old type 
batteries (or new guts to accept the newer batteries) and the shutter does not 
work w/o battery assist.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Robinsnes@xxxxxxx 
  To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 3:51 PM
  Subject: Re: [OM] Re: OM-2000


  In a message dated 11/22/00 4:03:26 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
  packardc@xxxxxxxxxx writes: 



    > ah, that might have the advantage of data back, but no double exposure 
    > lever - a must for mixed lighting conditions! 



  I am confused...why is a double exposure lever a must for mixed lighting? Why 
  would it have anything to do with lighting? 
  It's only function is to stop the transport of the film, which can be done 
  several ways, so you can put more than one image on a piece of film...and 
  hopefully not make a mess! It is a lot easier to do with roll film and 2 1/4 
  cameras. 
  Just my old mind trying to understand. 

  Roger Skully 
  robinsnestphotography.com 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz