One of the joys of zuiko; what to buy.
I don't have the 16, 18, 21 to miss; but, somehow this 17in monitor
can't quite match optical projection. It's still a thrill to see a photo
show up on the 'silver' screen, especially if it's one which took alot
of planning/work to get right. That's what I would miss the most.
The Polaroid is gathering dust, the LT105 and XA do fine snapshots; and
I suspect you're right, the OM's would still take the serious shots.
It's taken years to start to understand silver based photography; how
much would carry over to digital?
For now I've ordered more film, some projector bulbs, and sent the 2s
off for another cla.
Still like the digital OM1 shutter sound, fun idea.
> "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [OM] E10 in hand
>
> A $500 film scanner can do a much better job than a $2000 DC. Also,
> you will miss the 16, 18, 21, 24mm lenses. To select which to buy is
> all depends on your application. I will use OM for serious shoots.
> E-10 for snap, family event, experiment and replace the polaroid. =
>
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> David Irisarri wrote:
> > =
>
> > Hi William,
> > Why spending so many hours trying to calibrate your
> > scanner, colour space, removing dust into photoshop, when
> > you have a superb camera with enough resolution to print out
> > an A4 photo with 200 dpi!!! If I were you I won=B4t think it
> > twice.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|