| Subject: | [OM] An Assignment for Reese |
|---|---|
| From: | Kelton Rhoads <krho@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Dec 2000 15:01:02 -0800 |
>> I suspect that any >> degradation caused by a high quality filter is minuscule. Poor quality >> filters are probably another story. Hmm . . . I think this may call for another round of testing from Dr. Reese. Gary, we'd like to see you redo *each* of your lens tests with Olympus-brand filters . . . if it's (heh heh) not too much trouble . . . < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] Multiple messages - was Shoot before it's too late, Timpe, Jim |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] OM2000 or OM1? a Hypothetical Case, Kelton Rhoads |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Multiple messages - was Shoot before it's too late, wayneharridge |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] An Assignment for Reese, Gary Reese |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |