Thomas,
This is a classic 'it depends' answer. The 'it depends' is how much you
want to spend. I own the Polaroid Sprintscan 4000 and simply love it.
Excellent shadow detail and the highest resolution around.
I print fairly large sizes (many 13x19 -- the largest I can print) and have
done so with both a 2700dpi scanner (almost everything else on the market)
and at 4000dpi (the SS4000) and the difference is really easy to see.
For 8x10 and below, it is a whole different ballgame, there are many, many
excellent choices.
Hope that perspective helps.
Tom
From: <T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Anyways, I know that several of the list members have such, and I have
> read parts of the discussions from the past in the archives. However
> technology is moving fast so I take the liberty of asking. Which negative
> scanners are good/bad/ok? Which would be the "equivalent of the
> OM2s/p" (aka: the best game in town) and which should I stay far far away
> from?
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|