Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] I must be very annoying already...but...4 vs. 4T?

Subject: Re: [OM] I must be very annoying already...but...4 vs. 4T?
From: "Mickey Trageser" <mickeytr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 20:02:06 -0800
Chris,
I have an OM-4. I absolutely love it. It does not do the hi speed flash
synch with the 280. It may use batteries more quickly than a T model, but so
what? Batteries are cheap. If you don't keep spares with you at all times
you are living dangerously anyway. It has a wonderful feel, even if a few
grams heavier than the T model. If the camera appears to work well and is in
good condition, I wouldn't worry about the T notation. If the price is good,
snatch it up.
Mickey
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Stinson" <music4free@xxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2001 4:29 PM
Subject: [OM] I must be very annoying already...but...4 vs. 4T?


>
>
> I might be able to get ahold of an OM-4, (not a 4T) so I was wondering
what
> the consensus was on that camera?




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz