Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] [OT] - Texas succeeding

Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] - Texas succeeding
From: "Craig Henrikson" <chenriks@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 11:12:30 -0500
Sam -- I think you meant "seceding"  -- and I think you are correct.  I also
heard that Texas could break into 5 separate states if it wished.  Just
think what that would do to the electoral college!!

Craig

----- Original Message -----
From: "dolphans1" <dolphans1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] - Texas succeeding


> Texas is the only State that is able to or capable of succeeding from the
> Union, I believe they where the only State to not actually sign the decree
> when all the States joined. At least, this is what I read many years ago,
> whether a change occurred at a later date, I don't know. Can any
historians
> add or confirm, deny?
>
> Sam...
>
>
>
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz