Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: B/W on the Cheep

Subject: [OM] Re: B/W on the Cheep
From: "Lex Jenkins" <lexjenkins@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 00:58:03
Kelton, there ain't no such thing as doing true b&w photography cheep unless you process it yourself. The only reason commercial b&w processing *seems* expensive now is because color print processing has become so much cheaper in comparison. Years ago both were too damned expensive. So most of us shot mostly b&w and processed our own stuff. Then advances in color processing made it cheaper, while b&w is still processed pretty much the same old way - slow, labor intensive and expensive.

Frankly, I'd recommend using the chromogenic monochrome films like Kodak T400CN/Black & White+, Ilford XP2 Super, etc. After many discussions and comparing notes with users of these films and experienced photoprocessors I've discovered a trick that helps minimize the undesirable off-neutral tint on color print paper: use a green filter whenever possible; always use at least a yellow filter if you can't afford the light loss a green filter causes.

For whatever reason this seems to help balance things in such a way that neutral prints result more consistently. And for archival purposes these negatives can be printed on traditional b&w papers, tho' Ilford XP2 Super is best suited for this since it doesn't have the heavy orange mask of Kodak's films.

Ektamax paper is also excellent for producing sharp, perfectly neutral prints, but is not archival. It has a life span of perhaps 10 years depending on storage conditions, light, etc., but is excellent for scanning.

If you want to stick with conventional b&w films like Tri-X, processing the negatives isn't difficult or expensive and requires very little space. Have a lab make contact prints for you to determine which frames are best to print. After a while you can read b&w negatives well enough that you won't even need contact prints. Skipping these intermediate steps really helps save money.

Beyond this point you have to decide for yourself whether to commit the money and space to a wet darkroom or a digital darkroom with a film scanner and software designed to handle b&w negatives.
===========
Lex Jenkins
===========
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [OM] Re: B/W on the Cheep, Lex Jenkins <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz