----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Scales <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> I guess I am interested in the opinions of those that have used both. I
> love the 90/2, but this 50/2 seems like a real winner. So, what's the
real benefit of one over the other?
>
> Tom
Tom--and all other interested Zuiks,
I'm in a different position. I have the 50/3.5, which I love, and the
Tamron SP 90/2.5 macro (Adaptall II), which I love (but, boy, is it heavy!).
If there's anybody out there with experience of the Zuiko 90/2 and the
Tamron lens, is the Zuiko enough better to justify the difference in cost?
BTW, I don't do much portrature; mostly natural stuff in B&W.
Regards,
JohnP
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|