It has its uses. It works better than the E-6 comparables in dusk low light.
The grain is not objectionable in all circumstances. Here's a sample pic.
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/View?u=1430513&a=10718179&p=37954653&Sequence=0&res=high
Larry
"John A. Lind" wrote:
> At 03:28 1/13/01, you wrote:
> >I agree - I have been a long time K64 user. I tried K200 when it came out
> >but was disappointed with the grain.
> >
> >peter
>
> I have not used the K200 but the remarks from you and Acer about the grain
> are in keeping with everything else I've read. Possible that it may not be
> as much a problem with smaller prints than for projection. OTOH, K64 grain
> is very nearly as tight as K25 grain.
>
> -- John
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|