Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Film to flange distance in various OM bodies

Subject: Re: [OM] Film to flange distance in various OM bodies
From: clintonr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:21:46 -0600
There are NO VR's in the OM-2/2n METER.  The VR's you see are on the
main circuit, and are used to adjust the reference voltages and timing
circuits for the exposure control circuit -- that has nothing to do with
the meter.  The only other VR is the ASA input, which is also connected
to the main circuit -- the meter's ASA input is strictly mechanical.

Another interesting note -- the battery check circuit on the OM-2/2n has
no adjustments either!


C.H.Ling wrote:
> 
> But I found there was lot of OM-1(n) meter need calibration, the
> position do shift after time, could be there were some impact or shock
> that change the position. I know VR is bad, we made electronic
> ballast, in some circuits there is a adjustment resistor needed, we
> select the right one and put a fix resistor on each board. But I just
> want to say there are many ways for adjustment, you can't avoid it,
> some are better than the other but nothing perfect. Inside the OM2n
> there are at least three VRs, so the quote about no VR adjustment on
> OM1 and OM2 was wrong.
> 
> C.H.Ling
> 
> clintonr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > C.H.Ling wrote:
> >
> > > My be the OM1 does not have a variable resistor for meter adjust, but
> > > it adjust the meter mechanically by rotating of the galvanometer, does
> > > it make the adjustment more accurate?
> >
> > Not necessarily more accurate, but probably more reliable -- the
> > coupling mechanism won't wear or change to any appreciable degree, nor
> > will the resistors used to compensate the meter, so it will function
> > accurately until something breaks (or you can't get the proper battery!
> > ;^)  In my experience, if there's a variable resistor, it's there
> > because you'll need to change it!  If it's not there, you won't need
> > it!  And input VR's (like on the OM-2s ASA dial) are notorious for
> > becoming unreliable.  For my money, simpler is better.
> >
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz