ML Archiv: Re: [OM] 50mm f/1.2 Versions

Subject:	Re: [OM] 50mm f/1.2 Versions
From:	Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 21 Jan 2001 20:46:37 +1100

Or the newer Canon EOS 50/1.0L! (Not as sharp, according to Photodo as the
1.4 -hmmmm!)
Andrew


>Speaking of fast, don't forget the F0.95 lens on the old Canon rangefinder.
>
>Winsor



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] 50mm f/1.2 Versions, Doggre Re: [OM] 50mm f/1.2 Versions, Giles Re: [OM] 50mm f/1.2 Versions, John A. Lind Re: [OM] 50mm f/1.2 Versions, John Hudson Re: [OM] 50mm f/1.2 Versions, Mickey Trageser Re: [OM] 50mm f/1.2 Versions, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] 50mm f/1.2 Versions, Andrew Fildes <= RE: [OM] 50mm f/1.2 Versions, Chip Stratton RE: [OM] 50mm f/1.2 Versions, Chris O'Neill Re: [OM] 50mm f/1.2 Versions, Larry Re: [OM] 50mm f/1.2 Versions, Chris O'Neill [OM] [OT] Super-Speed Transparency [was] 50mm f/1.2 Versions, John A. Lind Re: [OM] [OT] Super-Speed Transparency [was] 50mm f/1.2 Versions, John A. Lind Re: [OM] [OT] Super-Speed Transparency [was] 50mm f/1.2 Versions, Ian A. Nichols Re: [OM] [OT] Super-Speed Transparency [was] 50mm f/1.2 Versions, John A. Lind [OM] Re: 1600 film (was "50mm f/1.2 Versions"), Joel Wilcox Re: [OM] 50mm f/1.2 Versions, Garth Wood

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] B+W "Slim" Polarizer for 49mm, Pandionhalietius
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Re: value of 50/1.8, Simon Evans
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] 50mm f/1.2 Versions, Winsor Crosby
Next by Thread:	RE: [OM] 50mm f/1.2 Versions, Chip Stratton
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]