Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] (Fwd) OT: LASIK: to see or not to see?

Subject: Re: [OM] (Fwd) OT: LASIK: to see or not to see?
From: "Charles Geilfuss" <cgeilfuss@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 01:58:47 -0000
Greetings Giles,
LASIK is something I've given quite a bit of thought to the last few years. I'll give you my pros and cons as I see them. BTW, I've worn glasses since the age of 11 (currently 46) but still remember being able to see clearly (oddly now that presbyopia is setting I can only read my watch by removing my glasses). Currently I'm up to -6.00 diopters in each eye. I wore contacts for a number of years, but my eyes no longer like them. Sorry I digress. PROS Lasik surgery seems to work very well. Both in published data and anecdotally people achieve very good correction and are able to give up glasses for distance vision. The recovery time is pretty short with little discomfort ( particularly with the type of surgery in which a flap of the cornea is raised and the underlying lens tissue is shaped by the laser to the correct refractive index). CONS Most patients have a temporary need for "artificial tears" for a few weeks after surgery. Probably has something to do with the cutting of fine nerve fibers in the cornea. Rarely this condition is long-lasting and the "tears" are required for many months. Extreme cases last over a year. The majority of patients see halos around bright lights at night. If your myopia is progressive, you will continue to develop nearsightedness and eventually will again require glasses.
 Hope this info is of help.

Cahrlie Geilfuss


From: "Giles" <cnocbui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] (Fwd) OT: LASIK: to see or not to see?
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 00:31:13 +0000

------- Forwarded Message Follows -------

Received: from Johnsonpa@xxxxxxx
From: Johnsonpa@xxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 19:13:42 EST
Subject: OT: LASIK: to see or not to see?
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Apologies if this topic has been covered in depth recently.  I checked the
archives and had to uns*ubscribe in May, so I'm a bit out of the loop.  In
any case, does anybody have any comments on LASIK (I think this is your
area of expertise Susan, right?)

It seems to that there are three basic groups of people when it comes to
vision: 1) those who have always been able to see 2) those who have worn
glasses so long they don't remember what it is like to see 3) those, like
me, who remember what it is like to be able to read the watch on their
wrist without glasses. (I'm currently -4.75 diopters and holding)

The response I get from the first group is usually something like, "I would
never risk my only pair of eyes on any type of surgery."  The second group
tends to not have much of an opinion because their glasses have always been
glued to their face.  I won't speak for third group and instead say that I
long to see again.  I remember well what it is like to see, how liberating
contacts can be, and aweful it is to be told that I should not wear
contacts more than a couple times a week for only a few hours a day (GPC,
for those who care...and through no fault of my own.  I cleaned and enzymed
my contacts religiously)

So really what I want to know is if their are any OM users with
testimonials?
Are there any side effects, like difficulty reading viewfinder information

(as though I can it all right now)?  I loathe trying to see everything
through the viewfinder under ideal conditions.  Let's not talk about when I
try to use the 20/2 Macro on bellows and try to focus while excluding
extraneous light.  Next thing ya' know my glasses are all dirty and all
hope is lost.  I'm sure many of you can relate.

If for some reason I decide not to get LASIK, I've got $3000 to blow on
Zuikos!  The top of my wish list in the 90/2 macro, 35 shift, and a
super-wide angle (18 or 21)!

--p.j.


--part1_7e.106cca59.27af4a36_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=2>Apologies if this topic has
been covered in depth recently. &nbsp;I checked the <BR>archives and had to
unsubscribe in May, so I'm a bit out of the loop. &nbsp;In any <BR>case,
does anybody have any comments on LASIK (I think this is your area of
<BR>expertise Susan, right?) <BR> <BR>It seems to that there are three
basic groups of people when it comes to <BR>vision: <BR>1) those who have
always been able to see <BR>2) those who have worn glasses so long they
don't remember what it is like to <BR>see <BR>3) those, like me, who
remember what it is like to be able to read the watch <BR>on their wrist
without glasses. (I'm currently -4.75 diopters and holding) <BR> <BR>The
response I get from the first group is usually something like, "I would
<BR>never risk my only pair of eyes on any type of surgery." &nbsp;The
second group <BR>tends to not have much of an opinion because their glasses
have always been <BR>glued to their face. &nbsp;I won't speak for third
group and instead say that I <BR>long to see again. &nbsp;I remember well
what it is like to see, how liberating <BR>contacts can be, and aweful it
is to be told that I should not wear contacts <BR>more than a couple times
a week for only a few hours a day (GPC, for those <BR>who care...and
through no fault of my own. &nbsp;I cleaned and enzymed my contacts
<BR>religiously) <BR> <BR>So really what I want to know is if their are any
OM users with testimonials? <BR>&nbsp;Are there any side effects, like
difficulty reading viewfinder information <BR>(as though I can it all right
now)? &nbsp;I loathe trying to see everything <BR>through the viewfinder
under ideal conditions. &nbsp;Let's not talk about when I <BR>try to use
the 20/2 Macro on bellows and try to focus while excluding <BR>extraneous
light. &nbsp;Next thing ya' know my glasses are all dirty and all hope
<BR>is lost. &nbsp;I'm sure many of you can relate. <BR> <BR>If for some
reason I decide not to get LASIK, I've got $3000 to blow on <BR>Zuikos!
&nbsp;The top of my wish list in the 90/2 macro, 35 shift, and a
<BR>super-wide angle (18 or 21)! <BR> <BR>--p.j. <BR></FONT></HTML>

--part1_7e.106cca59.27af4a36_boundary--


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz