ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Here you have, ;o)

Subject:	Re: [OM] Here you have, ;o)
From:	DaEyeGuy@xxxxxxx
Date:	Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:38:02 EST

In a message dated 2/12/01 11:59:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
halpert@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
<< I mentioned that is why I stay with Netscape, and was told sternly here 
that I was
 talking about the "old" version of Outlook. the "newest" version corrected 
"all
 that".
  >>
True..but how may list members are still using the old software? I suspect 
more than we even imagine..

Susan Steele
Virginia USA 
"God grant me the senility to forget the people 
   I never liked anyway, the 
   good fortune to run into the ones that I do, 
   and the eyesight to tell the difference."
                   ( Senility Prayer: Author Unknown) 

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Here you have, ;o), (continued) Re: [OM] Here you have, ;o), Nick Taylor Re: [OM] Here you have, ;o), Gregg Iverson Re: [OM] Here you have, ;o), Nick Taylor Re: [OM] Here you have, ;o), Gregg Iverson Re: [OM] Here you have, ;o), Nick Taylor Re: [OM] Here you have, ;o), Nick Taylor RE: [OM] Here you have, ;o), James N. McBride Re: [OM] Here you have, ;o), Nick Taylor Re: [OM] Here you have, ;o) (also contains OM content!), Christopher Biggs [OM] IMPORTANT, Charles Sdunek Re: [OM] Here you have, ;o), DaEyeGuy <= Re: [OM] Here you have, ;o), Simon Evans Re: [OM] Here you have, ;o), HI100

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] T-32 eBay BIN, Bob Whitmire
Next by Date:	[OM] Compare 100-200/5 with 75-150/4, Chris O'Neill
Previous by Thread:	[OM] IMPORTANT, Charles Sdunek
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Here you have, ;o), Simon Evans
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]