Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Slide duplication: SO-366 vs 5071

Subject: [OM] Slide duplication: SO-366 vs 5071
From: Erwin Voogt <erwin.voogt@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 22:43:49 +0100
Cc: hcvanveluwen@xxxxxxxxx, o.greve@xxxxxxx
Hi,

I have updated my page about slide duplication with the results of the Kodak
Ektachrome 5071. This film, contrary to the "daylight" Ektachrome SO-366, is
balanced for tungsten. I observed no differences between the SO-366 and the
5071, but I found it easier to work with the 5071 because you can use the
same light source for composing and exposing the image.
Details and examples can be found at:

http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/photovoogt/SO366/so366.html

If you have questions or remarks, please send them not only to the list, but
also to my e-mail address because I read the digests only occasionally.

Bye,

Erwin Voogt
Utrecht, The Netherlands


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [OM] Slide duplication: SO-366 vs 5071, Erwin Voogt <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz