Uncanny. That's exactly the progression I followed.
BB
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:18:36 -0600, Tom Scales wrote:
>We think alike. I owned both the 200/4 and 200/5, but found myself tossing
>the 200/5 in my bag more often because of it's size. Once I bought the
>180/2.8, the 200/4 got sold. When I need speed, that's my lens.
>
>Tom
>From: "Barry B. Bean" <bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>> Nice lens, although I prefer the 200/5 for weight and the 180/2.8 for
>> speed.
>>
>> BB
>> -
>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
-
B.B. Bean bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bean & Bean Cotton Co/Bean Farms http://www.beancotton.com
Peach Orchard, MO
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|