You mean I don't have a one of a kind? Just went and looked at mine and
you're right, it does say 80 and 135 on the front. I'm sure that is what it
is. That said, on the back, it does say 65-116.
Tom
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Tom Scales wrote:
>
> > As part of the infamous kit I bought, it includes an Olympus 80-135
Macro
> > extension tube. I admit I'm stumped. I know all about the 65-116, in
fact
> > I have one, but I've never heard of the 80-135. It's not in the SIF.
The
> > seller says it is an original OM part.
>
> If you read the green lettering on the 65-116 tube it says "135mm 80mm
MACRO".
> For someone unfamiliar with the autotube, that could be interpreted as a
> 135mm-80mm extension tube. Of course that heading is just an indicator
> for the reproduction ratios that you see when the tube is extended.
Nowhere
> on the auto tube does it say it's a 65-116 tube.
> -mark
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|