Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] What's the big deal with the 40mm 2.0?

Subject: Re: [OM] What's the big deal with the 40mm 2.0?
From: Gary Reese <pcacala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 04:35:27 -0800
I'm always taking pot shots at the performance of the 40mm f/2 Zuiko.
Look at what I snuck into the Lens Test page under point and shoots. A
pretty good little rangefinder with none other than a 40mm lens. They
made this about the same time as the Minolta CLE with the 40mm f/2

Minolta Hi-Matic 7 S II w/ 40mm f/1.7 Rokkor (multi-layer coating)
using self timer
Vignetting = B- @ f/1.7, A- @ f/2.8, A thereafter
Distortion = none
Aperture Center     Corner
f/1.7     B         C
f/2.8     A-        B-
f/4       A-        B
f/5.6     A-        B+
f/8       B+        B
f/11      B+        B
f/16      B         B
Notes: Low contrast images at f/1.7; moderate contrast images at f/2.8
and f/16; moderately high contrast images at f/4, f/8 and f/11; high
contrast images at f/5.6, which is the optimum aperture.

Gary Reese
Las Vegas, NV


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz