Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] In a possible defense of ebay?

Subject: Re: [OM] In a possible defense of ebay?
From: "John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 19:53:37 +0000
At 07:48 3/29/01, Sam wrote:
Something really strange happened to me on ebay today. The second bidder
informed that ebay informed him that the high bidder on a camera I sold
defaulted and that he was the high bidder.

Something else to watch for . . . check out the contact information about the closing winner and the person who retracted just before auction end. It doesn't happen that often that I'm aware of. Sometimes two bidders will conspire to scare others bidders off . . . and drop a winning price dramatically just before the auction ends through a retraction. The strategy (one forbidden by eBay, but hard to prove) is based on the fact that the closing price is set by the bid maximum entered by the 2nd highest bidder . . . it is one bid increment above it.

Bidder #1, an innocent party to all this, places a bid on an item early on. The bid maximum is below the average of what the item should close at. Perhaps the individual has done this to "watch" the auction, maybe with the intent to put in another, higher bid later.

Bidder #2 and Bidder #3 conspire to win the auction for Bidder #2 at a low price by scaring off potential bidders. Here is how they do it:

Bidder #2 tests Bidder #1's maximum by first putting in a relatively low bid maximum. If it trumps Bidder #1, then a second bid is immediately entered with a ridiculously high maximum. However, the "current bid" still shows only one increment above what Bidder #1's maximum is. Bidder #3, very soon after that, trumps Bidder #2 with a bid that is just high enough to do so. The price is now so high that nobody else is willing to try to outbid it. (If it happens, #2 and #3 just quit and walk away from the auction.) Then, just before auction close, Bidder #3 retracts. The price drops back to something lower than average, and Bidder #2 wins . . . at one bid increment above Bidder #1's low maximum.

If the closing price dropped dramatically when #3 retracted, the it could be that he/she was shielding #2 from competition. If the price dropped dramatically when the bidder retracted just before closing, it's cause for suspicion. It gets even more suspicious if the winner and retracting bidder live very, very near each other (same city/state).

-- John


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz