HI CH, where in Hong Kong might I buy the Minolta Aucte matte Screen you are
talking about? Will that work will with the other lenses?
By the way, I did get to visit the camera store on Nathan situated in an
alley near the park or zoo? There were three nice OM's, an OM 10, 2n, and a
4TI ! Whew! The OM 10 at about $110, the OM2n at about $ 200 and the OM 4TI
at $ 600.00. Prices indeed high but condition was near if not mint. How I
wish I could afford that 4T.
Regards
Titoy
----- Original Message -----
From: C.H.Ling <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Aperture on Zuiko 35-105/3.5~4.5
> That is the reason why I use Minolta Acute Matte screen instead of the
> 2-4.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> Gary Reese wrote:
> >
> > Another interesting thing about this lens: it doesn't work well with a
> > 2-4 screen. That is what I was observing in my post yesterday. It much
> > easier to focus (albeit still with some difficulty) using a 1-13
> > screen. It's not the first lens that a 2-4 screen failed with - I've
> > listed other on the lens test page.
> >
> > At the 35mm setting, the image looks sharp on a 2-4 screen at ANY
> > distance, even through a Varimagnifinder. Pretty wierd.
> >
> > Gary Reese
> > Las Vegas, NV
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|