----- Original Message -----
From: "drchrisbarrett" <drchrisbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <Sam.Shiell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Olympus List"
<olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 9:53 PM
Subject: [OM] OM2n
The OM2n is a damn good camera! My biggest mistake was part exchanging an
OM2n instead of a OM2sp when I bought my first OM4. I just think the OM2n is
a better camera than the OM2sp! Better battery consumption (with an on / off
switch), easier to use shutter ring, and easier to repair. I still have the
OM2sp, but when I see a good OM2n.........
Camera to trousers ratio 1:1 (actual number 5:5)
Jumping for joy!!!! My local camera shop Walters Ebbw Vale came
up trumps.The manager promised to try to find me some PX625 cells. Called in
today and he said make the most of these, they are the last, and offered me
8 mer*ury cells at £1 each. Of course I accepted! This shop is highly
recommended. Sometimes has Olympus equipment (35 /105mm zoom with small
scratch £50) and the manager Steve is fair and honest. Couple of Olympus
lenses at present 75/150, and 135mm3.5. Also a few camera bodies OM1black
over chrome? user, OM1n, OM2n, OM10,
regards,
John Duggan, Wales, U.K.
> I'm reminded of a quote by the wife of Stanley Kubrick (who I believe
> used Pen FT's), to the effect that he had more cameras than pairs of
> trousers [pants to the Americans 8^) ].
>
> So, I hereby instigate the Stanley Kubrick award to the Zuikoholic with
> the greatest ratio of OMs to trousers.
>
> (I'm almost certainly out of the running as my ratio is about 2:8).
>
> Come on folks, own up!
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|