I think Winsor refer to:
http://www.users.qwest.net/~rnclark/digital_advantage.htm
But I prefer the traditional print, the digital one just have more
sharpening not resolution, it look very....harsh.
On the other hand I think imagesetter is printer for output "B/W film" for
offset printing. The Lightjet 5000 should be a laser printer that "print"
RGB beam onto traditional photo paper.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian A. Nichols" <I.A.Nichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> On Tue, 1 May 2001, Winsor Crosby wrote:
>
> > On Roger Clark's web site,
> > http://www.users.qwest.net/~rnclark/index.htm, he makes a comparison
> > between optical printing with an enlarger and a digital print on
> > Cibachrome. The digital print seems amazingly better. How is that
> > done? Is there something like a printer with a light head instead of
> > a print head?
>
> Such a device has been around for a while - they're called imagesetters,
> though I've no idea if one was used for the comparison you refer to.
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|