Dave,
Honestly, I can't tell the difference between the quality of the pictures.
That's why I tend to 'own a 100/2', 'don't own a 100/2', back and forth.
The 90/2 is such a great all around lens.
Could you tell under a loupe? Probably. Do I view my pictures under a
loupe? Not very often.
Tom
> Zuiks,
>
> I've got both the Zuiko 90/2 and the 100/2. Other than 10mm, what is the
> 100/2 giving me that the 90/2 doesn't, other than the warm, fuzzy feeling
> instigated by that wiiiide expanse of front element glass on the 100/2?
Is
> there any significant difference in picture quality, bokeh, etc?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dave
>
> b
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|