I'm late as usual!!!!!!
I have a Tamron 90mm f 2.5. Would not be
without it.
As part of a deal I acquired an olympus 100mm f2.8 . The tamron lens is
superb!!! A good general purpose lens with very good macro performance.
BUT the 100 mm f2.8 is tiny by comparison. If I could choose only 1 it would
be the Tamron but I find I am using the Olympus lens more and more.
----- Original Message -----
From: <T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 10:43 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] 90/2 vs 100/2 vs 85/2 Revisited
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Dave Bulger wrote:
> Zuiks,
>
> As the poster of the original 90/2 vs 100/2 query, thanks to all for your
> comments & input. They've given me stuff to think about.
> , I am in the process
of designing and building a LF monorail. Thus far, I am no farther than
the design-and-parts-prototype stage. I expect that I will have a rough
overall design done in 3-4 months, and I expect the process to take a
while (a year or so) before an actual, picture-taking prototype is
build. However I expect that the first print from a home-build LF will
feel very good - regardless of what's in the picture.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|