Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Re: Working Distance (was "85/2 vs 90/2")

Subject: Re: [OM] Re: Working Distance (was "85/2 vs 90/2")
From: frieder.faig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 18:14:59 +0200
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:02:19PM -0500, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> >From: "John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- writ in part:
> >At 18:31 5/7/01, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> >>Hi John,
> >>
> >>Do you happen to know if your working distance using 135/2.8 with
> >>extension is similar to using a 135/4.5?
> 
> >
> >---------- Short Answer ----------
> >
> >Working distance would have to be approximately the same for the same
> >magnification because the focal length is the same


approximaltely yes, 
but my guess is that the working distance might even more with the 135 /2.8:
It is a tele construction with shorter built lenght than focal lenght. 

Though I´ve sold my 135/2 I can`figure ot out anymore.

Is there a sourc of information about Olympus lenses which gives exact fguers 
about the optical construction of Olympus lenses?


Frieder Faig

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz