Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Finally Got Some Photos on the Web

Subject: Re: [OM] Finally Got Some Photos on the Web
From: "Scott Nelson" <SNelson@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 11:03:44 -0400
No doubt your 4000 dpi scans are big. Works out to  800 images on a 40GB drive. 
Uncompressed, I imagine you'd be looking at 250MB or only 160 images, after 
that you go to tape...

>>> tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 08:33:03 05/17/2001 >>>
Not sure I completely agree. Each image from my scanner is 50-60Mb TIFF
compressed! That's what I keep, but that's 10 shots per CD.  It adds up.

Tom

From: "Scott Nelson" <SNelson@xxxxxxxx>


Really, the whole discussion doesn't grok as there's no reason to compress
your working image files since they are usually not transmitted across a
narrow pipe like WEB graphics. I suppose there's some saving of disk space,
but so what? Pesonally, I use Genuine Fractals.



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz