Maybe it's "mint" in the original sense, that it hasn't been touched since
being stamped flat by some very heavy machinery. :-)
Mike Veglia wrote:
> In a message dated 5/21/2001 "Craig Henrikson" <chenriks@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> writes:
> << re: "beat up looking OM-4T" -- what do you mean?? That camera was
> mint
> when I sold it to you!! >>
>
> Yup, that's the one. The infamous rental OM-4T. I have shot a whole
> bunch of film through it and it works great! Looks can be deceiving. The
> new back you put on still looks nice BTW. When you say "mint" I assume
> you mean "ebay mint" right? ;-) (Hmmm...do "ebay mint" cameras even
> function?)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|