Hopefully enough to have the lens repaired. Time will tell and i'll let
the list know how it turns out.
GeoW
On 25 May 2001, at 21:51, andrew fildes wrote:
> Hmmmm. How partial? Significantly partial I would think!
> AndrewF
>
>
>
> >Wouldn't be prudent just now as I am awaiting partial refund for the
> >repair.
> >
> >GeoW
> >
> >On 25 May 2001, at 17:36, andrew fildes wrote:
> >
> >> If this is the same guy - and if he isn't doing anything
> >> immediately about that dual purpose 300mm (aka. rare 180/2.8 with
> >> teleconverter) wouldn't appropriate revenge be to start mailing his
> >> bidders with the story? A heap of withdrawn bids might slow him
> >> down! AndrewF
> >>
> >>
> >> >The 300 was probably broken in two when he had to remove it from
> >> >the front of the OM-4. Probably a former Yugo mechanic. "Don't
> >> >force parts! Use a bigger hammer!"
> >> >
> >> >Dave Dougherty
> >>
> >
> >
> >< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> >< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> >< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|