ML Archiv: Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical or

Olympus-OM

Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical or

from Tom Scales

Subject:	Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical or
From:	"Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:09:40 -0500

Of course not. They're kids! They take everything for granted.

Tom


Well, Tom, do your kids realize that they are very lucky ;)

--thomas




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical or electronic s..., Timpe, Jim Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical or, Paul Farrar Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical or, Tom Scales Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical or, T . Clausen Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical or, Tom Scales <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Close Up Lenses, Tom Scales
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Listee Behavior (Was OM-3 & Collectors), Tom Scales
Previous by Thread:	Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical or, T . Clausen
Next by Thread:	[OM] re Close up lenses, Bolty
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]