I currently own a 65-200/4, which I am quite fond of. But, the balance on a
tripod, where I use it 1000f the time, is a little poor for my tastes...
Can someone who has used both, or even just the 85-250/5, comment on how it
balances on a tripod compared to the 65-200?
And optically, I would imagine both to be comparable... Weight and size
aren't a concern, and I like the two touch zoom characteristics of the
85-250.
Any comments would be appreciated.
Thanks, James.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|