I don't have the one for my 90 but I use a collapsible rubber hood
occasionally. Seldom (if ever) needed it because I normally use it as macro
and not portrait. I'd try it first with no hood and see what you think.
Bruce Kolber
St. Petersburg, FL 33715
USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Williamson" <mikew@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 3:41 PM
Subject: [OM] Tamron 49mm lens hood
> Well, I'm getting the 49mm version of the Tamron SP 90. Turns out the
seller
> doesn't have a lens hood for it. Anyone have a spare they want to sell?
I
> could get the 55mm version from B&H (or elsewhere) and use a step-up ring
(which
> I already have). Alternatively, I was thinking of getting an Olympus
100mm
> f2.8/85mm f2 hood (since it is also 49mm), reasoning that if it doesn't
vignette
> at 85mm it should be fine with a 90mm lens. Assuming I don't come across
the
> original 49mm Tamron lens hood, can anyone think of any reason to prefer
either
> the larger Tamron or the Olympus hood?
>
> Thanks once again for your help.
>
> Mike
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|