Tris:
I do think that the 135 is in my near future also, but I have found
myself working w/ the 85mm focal length more - it seems more natural to
the eye.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tris Schuler
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 10:11 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] 100/2 vs. 85/2 in sharpness
You might rethink it some and go with a 135mm. I notice Hermanson has
one
for sale, which means it'll come to you pristine. The thing is, with a
bit
longer lens you'll have more reach when you need it. It's often easier
to
back up a few steps than to get closer.
By the way, I've never worked with this Zuiko so I can't comment on its
personality--should it have one.
Tris
At 09:58 AM 7/12/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Dear enablers:
>
>I am looking to purchase (in the near future) a short telephoto for
>capturing architectural details. I was figuring that the 85/2 would do
>since this is the focal length that seems to look the best to my eye,
>but now you have me concerned about the sharpness. Any opinions on
>which one to get? What is the relative performance of the 100/2.8, and
>how does the 85/2 perform w/ the 2x-A? any and all help is
appreciated.
>
>Thanks!
>
>
>gries
>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|