Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] 200/2

Subject: RE: [OM] 200/2
From: "Maximiliano Pagliero \(CEA\)" <maximiliano.pagliero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:16:11 -0500
By the way, I listen opinions about which is the best lens for portraits ??

I hear that the 85 mm was the better size ???

Any consideration ?

Have FUN !!!

MAX - eager for the OM4....
 
> What film did you use? Aperture/shutter speed?
> 
> Tris
> 
> 
> At 10:46 AM 7/12/01 -0400, you wrote:
> >kazuya matsumoto wrote:
> >
> > >WARNING: 100/2 is sometimes too sharp for portraits unless you want
> > >to take all the pores in her skin IMHO.
> >
> >True, but there's a Tiffen filter (Softnet Diff. 1 skintone) 
> that tames the
> >100/2 just enough to make it a good portrait lens.  Then, 
> with the filter
> >off, it's back to its unrelenting sharp self again.  For an 
> example, see:
> >
> >http://albums.photopoint.com/j/View?u=135271&a=13487025&p=51692671
> >
> >Walt Wayman
> >
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz